skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Sweden’s school choice disaster? Nope
Great post by Michael McShane of AEI.
"Earlier this week, an article in Slate by Columbia Business School professor Ray Fisman provocatively titled “Sweden’s School Choice Disaster” made the rounds on Twitter, with the perfunctory head nodding and tut-tut-ing from the anti-school choice crowd.
From the jump, much of Fisman’s analysis didn’t really make sense. He
blames the drop Sweden has seen in international test scores since 2000
on the country’s voucher program, even though that program precedes the
drop by almost a decade. He also highlights the fact that only about
25% of secondary school students and only 13% of elementary school
students use vouchers to attend private schools, so it would be hard to
blame any nation-wide problems on such a small program. He further cites
studies that appear to show that voucher and non-voucher students score
about the same on fairly-grade exams. This is perhaps a scandal for
schools with inflated grades, but it is not evidence that the voucher
program is a “failure.”
But that’s about as deep as I want to dig. Luckily, several others
went farther down the rabbit hole to get into numerous other problems
with the piece.
Over at National Review, Tino Sanandaji offered myriad other possible explanations for Sweden’s poor performance on assessments. A key paragraph:
There is no doubt that the voucher reform was poorly
implemented, but this doesn’t change the fact that the reform worked.
Surveys suggest that parents and pupils in private schools tend to be
more satisfied than average. Many of the worst schools have simply
closed as few students choose them. Bullying is a major problem in
Swedish schools; with school choice, children are no longer forced to
attend the same school as their tormentors. Ambitious immigrant children
have the option to escape the ghetto and attend better schools. Some —
though admittedly not most — private schools have been innovative and
significantly improved education.
At Education Next, the Cato Institute’s Andrew Coulson lowered the boom. He writes:
Nevertheless, Slate claims that competition from
private schools may have led to “a race to the bottom” in Sweden. But
since Sweden’s private schools score higher on PISA than its public schools, it’s not obvious what this might mean. Could Slate be
claiming that the performance of private schools has been declining
faster than that of public schools? If so, the reverse is true. Since
the PISA test was first administered in 2000, Swedish private schools
lost a scant 6 points overall. The nation’s public schools lost 34
points over the same period—nearly six times as much. If one of these sectors is leading a race to the bottom, it’s not the private sector.
Finally, Jay Greene of the University of Arkansas offers Fisman’s work as a cautionary tale on his blog:
Fisman would never make such sloppy mistakes in a journal
submission or conference presentation. His colleagues would laugh at
him. But nothing seems to deter Fisman or other would-be Paul Krugmans
from making laughable claims in the popular press. Maybe academics
should not be given such a free pass for whatever they write outside of
journals. Maybe the credibility of their scholarly work and their
status within the academic community should also be called into question
if they are willing to be so reckless.
All good food for thought and worth checking out in full!"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.