skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Is the U.S. in the midst of a bee-pocalypse? The science says no.
See
Why the Buzz About a Bee-pocalypse Is a Honey Trap: Populations of the pollinators are not declining and a ban on neonic pesticides would devastate U.S. agriculture. From the WSJ. By
Henry I. Miller. Dr. Miller,
a physician and molecular biologist, is a fellow at Stanford
University's Hoover Institution. He was the founding director of the
FDA's Office of Biotechnolog. Excerpts:
"Bee populations in the U.S. and Europe remain at healthy levels for
reproduction and the critical pollination of food crops and trees. But
during much of the past decade we have seen higher-than-average
overwinter bee-colony losses in the Northern Hemisphere."
"Citing this disorder, antipesticide activists and some voluble
beekeepers want to ban the most widely used pesticides in modern
agriculture—neonicotinoids ("neonics" for short)—that account for 20% of
pesticide sales world-wide. This would have disastrous effects on
modern farming and food prices."
"neonics are much safer for humans and other vertebrates than previous pesticides."
"Yet there is only circumstantial or flawed experimental evidence of harm
to bees by neonics. Often-cited experiments include one conducted by
Chensheng Lu
of the Harvard School of Public Health that exposed the insects
to 30-100 times their usual exposure in the field."
"According to University of Maryland entomologist
Dennis
vanEngelsdorp, no cases (of collapse) have been reported from the field in three years.
The reality is that honeybee populations are not declining. According to
U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization statistics, the world's honeybee
population rose to 80 million colonies in 2011 from 50 million in 1960.
In the U.S. and Europe, honeybee populations have been stable—or
slightly rising in the last couple of years—during the two decades since
neonics were introduced, U.N. and USDA data show. Statistics Canada
reports an increase to 672,000 honeybee colonies in Canada, up from
501,000, over the same two decades."
"Australian honeybee populations are not in decline, despite the
increased use of [neonicotinoids] in agriculture and horticulture since
the mid-1990s."
"In April the EU released the first Continent-wide epidemiological study
of bee health in Europe, covering 2012-13 (before the EU's neonic ban
went into effect). Seventy-five percent of the EU's bee population
(located in 11 of the countries surveyed) experienced overwinter losses
of 15% a year or less—levels considered normal in the U.S. Only 5% of
the EU's bee population (located in six northern countries) experienced
losses over 20%, after a long, severe winter."
"A ban on neonics would not benefit bees, because they are not the chief
source of bee health problems today. Varroa mites are, along with the
lethal viruses they vector into bee colonies. If neonics were dangerous,
how to explain that in Canada, Saskatchewan's $19 billion canola
industry depends on neonics to prevent predation by the ravenous flea
beetle—and those neonic-treated canola fields support such thriving
honeybee populations that they've been dubbed the "pastures for
pollinators.""
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.