Evaluating the free market by comparing it to the alternatives (We don't need more regulations, We don't need more price controls, No Socialism in the courtroom, Hey, White House, leave us all alone)
Monday, July 27, 2020
Progressive ‘Squad’ Members Are Pushing a Bailout for the Privileged in the Middle of a Pandemic
The Squad’s latest push for a federal bailout would be a boon for privileged Americans
"Both Rep. Ayanna Pressley and Rep. Ilhan Omar made their names as
self-avowed “democratic socialists” and members of the “Squad,” a group
of far-left Democratic lawmakers seeking to overhaul the US economic
system in the name of justice and equality.
So, it might surprise you to hear that in the middle of a pandemic
decimating minority communities and the working class, Pressley and Omar
are demanding a big government bailout for a well-off segment of
society.
Just this week Pressley took to her Twitter account to demand, among
other things, that we “cancel student debt.” This echoes her colleague
Omar’s recent call to “cancel it all right now.”
It’s important to put these statements from two of the Squad’s most
prominent members in context. Both have long supported “canceling” the
nation’s $1.6 trillion in student loan debt, which really means forcing taxpayers to pay it off. As the Wall Street Journalexplains,
this proposal “wouldn’t make [student loan] debt disappear. It would
merely transfer it to the federal debt… and stick taxpayers with the
tab.” Support for this redistributive policy is not a new position for
Omar or Pressley by any stretch.
And make no mistake, the Squad’s push for “canceling” student loan
debt is indeed proposing a massive handout to the upper class. Why?
Well, student debt is, by definition, only held by individuals who
attended college. It’s easy to forget it in today’s culture, but most
Americans do not hold college degrees.
According to the Census Bureau, just roughly 1 in 3 American adults
over age 25 have a four-year college degree. This segment of society is
the only group helped by mass student loan cancellation. But adults
with college degrees also have much higher average lifetime earnings and
salaries.
Consider the below graph from the left-leaning think tank the Urban Institute.
Image Credit: Urban Institute
Student debt is disproportionately held by those at the upper ends of the income spectrum. As the Urban Institute surmises, “debt forgiveness plans would be regressive—providing the largest monetary benefits to those with the highest incomes.”
So in canceling student debt, progressives legislators would be
helping a disproportionately well-off segment of society at the average
taxpayer’s expense. The injustice here lies not just in the fact that
this policy provides relief to the well-off and not the working class.
It’s also wildly unfair—and not at all “progressive”—that even lower and
middle-class taxpayers who didn’t go to college would have to pay for
the bailout via increased taxation or the long-term consequences of more
government debt.
That’s right: Lena the hairdresser would have to pay more taxes so
Jake the corporate lawyer doesn’t have to pay off his undergraduate
loans. How does that promote “social justice” or the interests of the
working class?
It’s particularly perplexing that these self-described socialists are
pushing this bailout for the affluent in the middle of a pandemic that,
as the pair regularly points out, is overwhelmingly hurting society’s
most disadvantaged. Think about it: Layoffs and job losses due to
COVID-19 lockdowns are largely hitting service industries, retail, and
other forms of blue-collar work. Meanwhile, many college graduates—aka
student debt holders—work in white-collar jobs that don’t just pay more,
but also lend themselves more easily to remote work during a pandemic.
This isn’t to suggest that the ramifications of COVID-19 and economic
lockdowns aren’t hurting college graduates. They are hurting everyone.
But it’s important to point out that in the middle of this pandemic,
white-collar college graduates are not the ones most in need of help.
Not even close.
Surprised to see America’s most prominent socialists fighting for the
interests of the elite even amid a national crisis? That’s
understandable, but you really shouldn’t be.
As the renowned free-market economist and thinker Thomas Sowell once wrote,
“The greatest moral claim of the political left is that they are for
the masses in general and the poor in particular. That is also their
greatest fraud. It even fools many leftists themselves.”
Indeed, leftist economic interventions often start with noble
intentions of ostensibly helping the poor. But they end up instead
reflecting the interests of the elite, who have the power and resources
to sway government officials.
“The most harm of all is done when power is in the hands of people
who are absolutely persuaded of the purity of their instincts—and the
purity of their intentions,” Nobel laureate and economist Milton
Friedman once said. “The use of force to achieve equality will destroy
freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the
hands of people who use it to promote their own interests.”
Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises made a similar point in his work Human Action.
“There is no such thing as a just and fair method of exercising the
tremendous power that interventionism puts into the hands of the
legislature and the executive,” Mises wrote. “In many fields of the administration of interventionist measures, favoritism simply cannot be avoided.”
One doesn’t have to doubt the benevolence of Omar and Pressley’s
intentions to observe that the same phenomenon is corrupting the
socialist legislators’ COVID-19 policy response. Like so many of the
socialists that have come before them, the Squad’s rhetoric claims
solidarity with the working class while their actual plan would only aid
the elite."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.