skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Dr. Christy Rebuts Alarmist Spin on Satellite Data
By Marlo Lewis, Jr. of CEI.
"The
divergence between satellite data and climate model warming predictions
has long been too large for “consensus” scientists to ignore, and it
keeps growing despite 2015 being anointed the “warmest year on record.”
Unsurprisingly, the usual suspects try to discredit the satellite
data, even to the point of suggesting that surface records,
notwithstanding their well-known heterogeneity, gaps, and quality-control issues, are more reliable.
In testimony earlier this week before the House Science Committee, University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) atmospheric scientist John Christy rebuts a Yale Climate Connections video featuring several heavyweights of the climate science establishment.
The video claims satellites do not actually measure temperature, but
infer it from microwaves emitted by oxygen molecules in the atmosphere.
That is true but irrelevant. Christy explains: “In reality, the sensors
on satellites measure temperature by emitted radiation—the same method
that a physician uses to measure your body temperature to high precision
using an ear probe. Atmospheric oxygen emits microwaves, the intensity
of which is directly proportional to the temperature of the oxygen, and
thus the atmosphere. . . . As an aside, most surface temperature
measurements are indirect, using electronic resistance.”
The video also claims satellites’ loss of altitude over time due to
atmospheric friction—a phenomenon called orbital decay—induces a cooling
bias. Again, true but irrelevant. “This vertical fall has an
immeasurable impact on the layer (Mid-Troposphere or MT) used here and
so is a meaningless claim. In much earlier versions of another layer
product (LT or Lower Troposphere), this was a problem, but was easily
corrected almost 20 years ago. Thus, bringing up issues that affected a
different variable that, in any case, was fixed many years ago is a
clear misdirection that, in my view, demonstrates the weakness of their
position.”
Finally, the scientists in the video cite the cooling bias from the
satellites’ tendency to drift from east to west. Far from being
unacknowledged by Christy, the UAH team was the first to detect that
bias, and corrected for it 10 years ago. Moreover, the error was not a
factor in the MT layer, where observations reveal a sharp divergence
from climate model projections.
For further discussion, see my blog post, “Satellites and Global Warming: Dr. Christy Sets the Record Straight.”"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.