Sunday, February 27, 2022

A Mistaken Case for Splitting Amazon in Two

Who determines whether pricing is ‘predatory’?

Letter to The WSJ.

"Mr. Lonsdale argues that Amazon’s cloud-computing division, Amazon Web Services, is cross-subsidizing Amazon’s other services. But he makes inferences about cross-subsidies for a multiproduct firm with fixed and common costs on the basis of one atypical year’s financial data. As has been widely reported in the financial press, Amazon’s e-commerce business ran into headwinds last year due to rising labor costs, labor shortages and supply-chain constraints.

Modern antitrust law has set a high hurdle for predatory-pricing cases, because consumers benefit from lower prices. A more activist and populist predatory-pricing policy runs the risk of evolving into a form of price regulation, whereby enforcers implicitly establish a price floor, but without a sound basis for doing so. We should be wary of a policy that makes successful firms liable for lowering prices or improving quality—normally considered pro-competitive activities.

Thomas Lenard

Technology Policy Institute

Washington"


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.