Pharmaceutical innovation will suffer and drugs that could save your life may not reach the market.
By Tomas J. Philipson. He is an economist at the University of Chicago. Excerpts:
"These controls would raise, not lower, the price Americans pay for better health. Price controls will harm innovation, and new drugs are a form of reducing prices. A new drug, even an expensive one, offers society something that wasn’t previously available. Until recently, someone with HIV, breast cancer or hepatitis C couldn’t buy a longer life at any price. But then came innovative drugs. Covid-19 vaccines similarly slashed the cost of preventing infection and serious illness. Generics, which make up about 95% of prescriptions, help push prices down but aren’t possible without the price reductions from that first innovative drug.
Unfortunately, the debate is being informed by erroneous Congressional Budget Office analysis. CBO says that price controls will cut prescription drug prices 57% to 75% among the most expensive 250 drugs that form the base of U.S. profits. Somehow, though the U.S. is home to roughly 70% of the world’s drug profits, the supply of new drugs will only be reduced by 5% from 2021 to 2039, a loss of only two drugs a year.
The CBO minimizes the harmful effects on innovation, but the entire supply chain that funds medical R&D relies on rate-of-return assessments driven by future earnings. An analysis I released this week finds 10 times the effect on R&D, a loss of up to some 340 drugs over the same period.
The White House also claims that price controls won’t hamstring innovation because they only govern top-selling drugs. But the occasional blockbuster funds the roughly 90% of pipeline drugs that never pass Food and Drug Administration review. CBO even acknowledges that only the top 7% of Medicare drugs drive U.S. profits. Targeting financially successful drugs could make large segments of the development portfolio unprofitable, even if such drugs aren’t affected by price controls.
Another theme of the White House’s proposal is to increase payments for drugs based on their value to patients. This sounds nice—until you realize that bureaucrats, not the market, will determine that value. The bureaucrats often don’t count important drug benefits, such as the enormous value of the economic activity that resumed after Covid-19 vaccines became available."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.