skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Net Neutrality: Market Competition or Political Control?
B Jessica Melugin of CEI.
"If net neutrality
advocates are successful in their efforts to give government ever more
control over broadband Internet access, they will be surprised to find
you cannot regulate the world into perfection.
Supporters of various versions of net neutrality imply a false choice
between a censored and curtailed Internet, controlled by unregulated
broadband companies, and an ideal Internet utopia, flourishing thanks to
federal regulations.
The real alternative to the light regulatory touch the Internet
enjoyed during its first twenty years—one that admittedly left
executives at Verizon, Comcast, and AT&T to figure out what
consumers wanted—is an Internet experience controlled by unelected
government bureaucrats and elderly politicians (the average age of a Representative is 57 and the average of a Senator is 61).
Does that sort of big government control strike anyone as a recipe
for unfettered free speech and torrents of innovation? It shouldn’t.
Certainly, markets don’t deliver everything to everyone perfectly at
all times. But as flawed as your broadband provider’s customer service
or variable connectivity speed can be, it’s still better than dealing
with the post office or the IRS.
That’s largely because, if it gets maddening enough, you can quit
your broadband provider and switch to another one. Or at least most of
us can: FCC data shows that 97 percent of census blocks had more than
one provider offering at minimum 10 Mbps as of 2016. You don’t get the
option to take your business elsewhere at the DMV.
It’s that consumer power in a relatively unfettered marketplace
that’s driven the striking growth and improvement in broadband speeds
and availability. Current Federal Communications Commission Chairman
Ajit Pai noted in his 2015 dissent to the Open Internet Order
that the United State’s light regulatory approach resulted in much
faster speeds for consumers and more industry investment in wireline
deployment than the utility-style regulation in Europe has produced.
Laying net neutrality regulations and restrictions on this dynamic
industry will reduce the rate of returns for these broadband providers
and, all else being equal, will lower investment, as Duke University
Professor Michelle Connolly recently explained at an economist’s roundtable.
The Internet is no exception to the rule that markets work better
than the federal government does. That should give everyone pause in the
net neutrality debate."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.