"Three arguments for the Ex-Im Bank were given:
1. It creates jobs. Of course it does! If the government were to put the names of all businesses into a hat, pull out a few randomly, and give those business a per unit subsidy, those business would expand and hire more workers. So what? That would not make it a good policy, because the wrong jobs would be created.
2. It returns money to the Treasury. Really? If the bank were truly a profitable venture, we could privatize it. I bet if the government tried to sell off the Ex-Im Bank, it wouldn't get much, if anything at all. If the Bank's activity were actually profitable, we wouldn't need a government-run bank to do it.
3. Other countries give similar subsidies to their firms. So what? If other nations engage in corporate welfare, that is no reason for the United States to follow suit in the name of a level playing field. We don't need to import other nation's bad policies.
Maybe there are better arguments for the Export-Import Bank. But if this is the best advocates of the Bank can do, it shouldn't be reauthorized."
Sunday, June 14, 2015
Greg Mankiw On The Export-Import Bank
From his blog.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.