skip to main |
skip to sidebar
More on the ‘imaginary hobgoblin’ of ‘rising income inequality’ with new data from today’s Census report
From Mark Perry.
"
We hear all the time about “rising income inequality” in America (there are about 1 million Google search results
for that term), about “the rich getting richer and the poor getting
poorer,” the “stagnant or disappearing middle class,” all of recent
income gains going to the rich,” the lack of income mobility and other
narratives of pessimism. And yet, nobody seems to have shared those
negative narratives with the Census Bureau, which released new data
today on “Income and Poverty in the US: 2013,” because some of those data tell a slightly different story.
1. The top chart above shows the shares of total income earned by the
top 20% and top 5% of US households from 1993 to 2013 (from Table A-2).
In 1993, 49% of total income went to the top quintile of US households,
and 20 years later in 2013, the share of income going to the top 20%
has increased to only 51%. Likewise, in 1993 the share of total income
going to the top 5% of US households was 21%, that share had increased
to only 22.2%. Interestingly, the 22.5% share last year was slightly
lower than the 22.4% of income that went to the top 5% in 2001. Over the
last two decades, the income share of the top 20% (top 5%) has been
remarkably stable at about 50-51% (21-22%) and there has been no
statistical evidence of “rising income inequality” according to this
measure.
2. The bottom chart above shows annual Gini indexes of income
inequality (a statistical measure of income dispersion that quantifies
income inequality on a range from 0% for complete equality to 100% for
complete inequality) for US households from 1993 to 2013 (also from
Table A-2). Like the first two measures above, the Gini index measure of
income dispersion reveals that there has been no significant trend of
“rising income inequality” for US household income in recent decades –
the Gini index in 1993 was 0. 454 and in 2013 it was 0.476, a slight
decrease from 0.470 in 2010 and 2011 and 0.477 in 2012, and has shown
remarkable stability for the last several decades.
MP: Whether we look at Census Bureau data on the
share of total income going to the top fifth and top 5% of American
households, or Census data on Gini coefficients for U.S. household
income, there is absolutely no statistical support for the commonly held
view by the public, academia and the mainstream media that income
inequality has been rising in recent years or decades. A more accurate
description of income inequality over the last several decades would be
to say that it “flat-lined” starting in about 1993.
So why are we even having this national debate about solutions to the
“non-problem” of rising income inequality that doesn’t even exist by
these Census Bureau measures? Maybe it’s another example of what H.L.
Mencken called an “imaginary hobgoblin“:
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the
populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.