For the larger sample of CEOs reported by the BLS, their average pay
of $178,400 last year was an increase of only 0.88% from the average CEO
pay of $176,840 in 2012. In contrast, the BLS reports that the average
pay of all workers increased by 1.42% last year to $46,440 from $45,790
in 2012. That’s right, the average worker last year saw an increase in
their pay that was more than 60% greater than the increase in pay for
the average US CEO. And the “CEO-to-worker pay ratio” for the average
CEO compared to the average worker is only about 5-to-1, nowhere close
to the pay ratio of 331-to-1 ratio reported by the AFL-CIO using the 350
highest-paid CEOs in the country or the 300-to-1 ratio that Robert
Reich claims.
So at the same time that Reich complains about the excessive
compensation of a small group of a few hundred highly paid CEOs, he
actually makes
36% more than the average CEO in the US for lecturing a few hours a week
(see chart above). Even considering additional work preparing lectures
and grading papers or exams, it’s probably safe to assume that Professor
Reich is putting in 50-60 hours per week like the majority of America’s
CEOs for his very generous pay of more than a quarter-of-a-million
dollars per year.
In addition to his annual CU-Berkeley salary of $242,613, Professor
Reich is also a popular speaker on the nation’s lecture circuit, and he
commands a handsome
speaking fee of $40,000 for a one-hour talk
(including Q&A) plus first class travel for one or two people from
California, hotel accommodations for up to two nights, ground
transportation, meals and incidentals. That’s the quote I got today from
one of Professor Reich’s speaking bureaus for his fee to give a
presentation as part of a “university program” — it’s possible that he
charges even more for corporate events. So we have the former labor
secretary complaining about a pay gap between CEOs and average workers,
when he gets almost as much in compensation for a one-hour talk as the
average American worker earns working full-time for an entire year (see
chart above)! If he gives only six speeches a year, his annual income
approaches half-a-million dollars a year, putting him solidly in
America’s “top 1%” by income – a group the “class warrior” frequently
criticizes (see examples
here and
here). .
As I said in a
previous post,
I think it’s actually great that Robert Reich gets a market-based fee
for his speeches, and I applaud him for commanding $40,000 per one-hour
speech that allows him to enjoy a very comfortable life in the “top 1%.”
But it then seems deeply hypocritical when he complains that airlines
are “deeply exploitative” when they use market-based, surge pricing (see
post at the link above) or when he complains that the pay for several
hundred CEOs relative to the average worker’s pay is excessive. In all
cases – Robert Reich’s $242,613 UC-Berkeley salary, his $40,000 speaking
fees, CEO pay, airline pricing, and the average worker pay – those
salaries, prices and fees are not determined independent of the market,
but in each case
primarily determined by market forces.
Therefore, it seems deeply inconsistent for Reich to complain about the
market forces that determine CEO pay, airline surge pricing and average
worker pay, but then take advantage of those same market forces to earn
a $242,613 salary for teaching one class per semester and charge
$40,000 for a one-hour talk and enjoy life in the “top 1%.” And in any
discussion of CEO pay we should remember that the average CEO in America
earned only $176,400 last year (not multi-millions of dollars),
received an increase in salary less than the average worker, and earned
only about 5 times more than the average worker (not 300X more).
HT: Steve Bartin, see his
post today about Robert Reich here."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.