skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Defending Green Cards
By Alex Nowrasteh of Cato.
"The 2016 GOP platform states that:
“In light of the alarming levels of unemployment and
underemployment in this country, it is indefensible to continue offering
lawful permanent residence to more than one million foreign nationals
every year.”
The GOP platform statement assumes that those on green cards take jobs from Americans, an assumption that is incorrect (see here, here, and here for more information).
What’s actually indefensible about our green card system is how few
of them come here for work purposes. First, legal immigrant inflows to
the U.S. as a percent of our population are small compared to other
developed countries (Figure 1). The only countries with fewer immigrant
inflows as a percent of their populations are Portugal, Korea, Mexico,
and Japan. The United States does allow more immigration as an absolute
number than any other country but we also have a very large population,
making these annual flow figures seem small.
Figure 1
Immigrant Inflows as a Percent of Population, 2013
Sources: OECD, EuroStat, E-Stat, Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
These relatively small immigrant flows have only produced an
immigrant percentage of our population that is midrange among the OECD
countries (Figure 2). New Zealand has the highest at 28.4 percent of
their population while Mexico has the lowest at 0.84 percent of theirs.
The United States is in the middle at 13 percent. Our legal
immigration system is so restrictive that without unauthorized
immigrants the U.S. population of the foreign-born would only be about
9.5 percent of our population – a 28 percent reduction in present
numbers.
Figure 2
Immigrant Stock as a Percent of the Population, 2013
Source: OECD.
Green card workers admitted as a percentage of the total annual
immigrant inflow are far lower here than in other countries (Figure 3).
Only about 7.7 percent of all green cards annually issued by the U.S.
government are for workers – virtually all of them high skilled. The
employment-based green card system allowed about 140,000 green cards to
be issued annually but that number also includes the family members of
those workers. In 2014, 56 percent
of green cards set aside for skilled workers actually went to family
while 44 percent were for the workers themselves. The GOP platform
wants to decrease this already small number of green cards for skilled
workers even further.
Figure 3
Immigrant Workers as a Percent of All Immigrants, 2013
Source: OECD.
To put the silliness of the GOP platform into further context, the
2013 inflow of green cards for workers was equal to 0.04 percent of all
native-born workers (Figure 4). In Australia, the annual inflow of
immigrant workers as a percent of native Aussie workers is 12 times as
great. In 2013, native labor force participation rates in Australia
were 6.6 percentage points higher than in the United States according to
the OECD. Do you still think immigrant workers cause unemployment?
Figure 4
Immigrant Workers as a Percent of Native Workers, Annual Flow, 2013
Source: OECD.
Immigrants issued green cards for working purposes are not the only
immigrants who work, of course. Most immigrants in the United States
arrive as relatives of Americans or other immigrants, more than in any
other country (Figure 5). However, about half of those family
immigrants work even though they didn’t receive and employment-based green card.
Figure 5
Immigrant Family Members as a Percent of All Immigrants, 2013
Source: OECD.
Australia, New Zealand, Canada and most of the other countries with
more open immigration policies emphasize skilled immigration. The
current U.S. green card system also emphasizes skilled immigration among
the workers it lets in but by setting aside most green cards for
families, our system ends up skewing them toward lower-skilled workers
related to Americans. Ultimately, the United States should liberalize
the immigrationoorf both lower and higher-skilled foreign workers. The
GOP platform wants to go in the opposite direction, further shrinking
the already paltry quantity of skilled immigrant workers allowed in.
Immigration is not like a budget that must eventually be balanced.
The United States government can allow in more skilled immigrant
workers, more family-based immigrants, and more lower-skilled foreigners
– no numerical offsets are required. The number of immigrants allowed
in annually, roughly one million, is neither set by legislation nor is
it determined by the laws of economics as the complex legal quota system
has naturally settled at an equilibrium of about that number.
Liberalizing high skilled worker immigration has the most political
support and will have the greatest impact, per immigrant, for the U.S.
economy. That seems like an easy place to start."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.