See
Medicaid Needs Reform, Not Expansion by Brian Blase Mercatus. Excerpts:
"Yet, two years into the implementation of the ACA, there
are more reasons than ever for Virginians to turn down the Medicaid
expansion.
First, a recent study by a team of renowned
economists from MIT, Harvard, and Dartmouth shows that Medicaid
enrollees place a low value on the program.
The
economists found “that Medicaid’s value to recipients is lower than the
government’s costs of the program, and usually substantially below.”
They
estimate that recipients only benefit by 20 to 40 cents for each dollar
of Medicaid spending, while large institutions, like hospitals, nursing
homes, and insurance companies, receive the lion’s share of the
benefit.
Second, a large body of research shows that
Medicaid enrollees tend to suffer worse health care outcomes than
similar patients without Medicaid. Largely because of relatively low
payment rates to providers, Medicaid enrollees have less access to a
regular source of health care and tend to receive worse care, such as
being assigned to less-skilled surgeons.
Third,
Medicaid recipients receive a disproportionate amount of non-emergency
care in emergency rooms. Recent data suggests that the Medicaid
expansion has made this problem worse, not better.
Fourth,
Medicaid expansions tend to cause people to replace their (often
superior) and privately financed coverage with Medicaid.
Fifth, Virginia’s
Medicaid spending is already rapidly increasing, threatening other
state priorities. Over the past 25 years, Virginia’s Medicaid spending,
adjusted for population growth and inflation, more than tripled. Between
1989 and 2014, Medicaid more than doubled as a percentage of total
state spending, while the share of spending going to elementary and
secondary education, higher education, and transportation has all
dropped.
Sixth, states adopting the ACA Medicaid
expansion have experienced much larger enrollment and spending increases
than expected. More than twice as many people enrolled in Kentucky as
expected, more than doubling the expansion’s cost to the state. Twice as
many as expected also enrolled in Washington, and nearly three times as
many as expected enrolled in California. In Michigan, costs are 50
percent higher than anticipated, and Ohio’s costs are more than twice
what was anticipated."
"In 1990, Washington spent $41 billion ($75 billion in 2015
dollars) on Medicaid, equal to about 3 percent of all federal spending.
In 2015, Washington will spend about $320 billion, or nearly 9 percent of all federal spending."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.