The notion that skipping breakfast might
cause weight gain entered the Dietary Guidelines in 2010, during one of
the reviews conducted every five years by experts to update its
findings… [They] collected research on skipping breakfast. Some of it
did, indeed, suggest that breakfast skippers may be more likely to gain
weight.
But the evidence the experts on the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee relied on were observational. As Peter Whoriskey commented,
“observational studies in nutrition are generally cheaper and easier to
conduct. But they can suffer from weaknesses that can lead scientists
astray.”
And astray they went. When the Advisory Committee decided to
enshrine their “breakfast-weight hypothesis” into the Dietary
Guidelines, they cited only one randomized controlled trial, which found
“no relationship with breakfast alone” and weight gain.
Last year, however, a team of researchers from Columbia University did a controlled trial
to examine this breakfast hypothesis. They divided a large number of
people into “oatmeal breakfast,” “frosted corn flakes breakfast,” and
“no breakfast” groups. At the end of the trial they found that the
breakfast-skippers lost more weight than the other groups.
It’s worth noting, however, that the “no-breakfast” group had
slightly higher LDL (bad) and HDL (good) cholesterol. So, it’s a bit of a
tossup on how healthy it is to skip breakfast or eat
breakfast. Likely, it has a lot to do with a person’s individual makeup
and the rest of one’s diet and fitness.
Yet, they decided to canonize this questionable hypothesis in the
guidelines, taking from the realm of possibly good advice to gospel.
It’s not so much that the government got it wrong, it’s that they took a
hypothesis that was up in the air—that was going through the proper
scientific examination-testing-refutation-clarification process—and they
brought down the gavel and decided on a position. I call this
bureaucratization of knowledge, but Whoriskey puts it this way:
A closer look at the way that government
nutritionists adopted the breakfast warning for the Dietary Guidelines
shows how loose scientific guesses — possibly right, possibly wrong —
can be elevated into hard-and-fast federal nutrition rules that are
broadcast throughout the United States.
Is this sort of invalidation of government nutrition embarrassing?
Maybe. But more importantly, it’s affecting the way Americans eat and
impacting our health, perhaps even contributing to some of the
“epidemic” health problems for which they keep demanding more money to solve. They were wrong about dietary cholesterol, still wrong about saturated fat, still wrong about sodium (even though their own researchers say they’re wrong), and wrong when they made the food pyramid. Perhaps it’s time we fired our government nutritionists. After all, they don’t seem to be very good at the job."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.