Evaluating the free market by comparing it to the alternatives (We don't need more regulations, We don't need more price controls, No Socialism in the courtroom, Hey, White House, leave us all alone)
Friday, October 8, 2021
Does the nuclear waste storage problem remain largely unaddressed?
"“Nuclear has a waste storage problem that remains largely unaddressed .”
Not so. The first, and easiest way to address it is to reprocess
spent fuel as France does. The next is to use modern reactor designs
that actually clean up old fuel from light water reactors. For example,
Canada’s CANDU reactor, a proven common design, can burn the fuel from
U.S. LWR reactors, and its own spent fuel is only dangerous for on the
order of a thousand years (600-1200), instead of the 30,000 from current
US designs. Maintaining waste for hundreds of years is feasible, and on
a whole different scale than a 30,000 year storage plan.
Another plan for the waste problem os small modular reactors, which
are never refueled onsite. You bring in the fueled reactor, run it for
10 years, then exchange it for a new one and take the old one back to
the factory to be refueled. That centralizes waste and prevents all the
problems with on-site storage. With waste reprocessing, 90% of it goes
back into the reactor for the next decade.
There are known, robust solutions to these problems. Anti-nuke types just ignore them.
That is from Dan Hanson from the comments section."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.