skip to main |
skip to sidebar
SEIU Support for Minimum Wage Hikes Based on Self-Interest
By Trey Kovacs of CEI.
"Why is the Service Employees International Union funneling $15 million into the Fight for 15 campaign when the average private-sector union member makes $22 an hour and only 1 percent of the American workforce earns the minimum wage?
Union rhetoric would tell you that they support wage hikes as a means
to preserve the middle class and to lift low-wage workers out of
poverty.
However, what many do not realize is that unions’ self-interest is
the primary motivation for their support of wage hikes, not altruism or
concern for the well-being of low-wage workers.
Minimum and living wage laws benefit union interests in one of two ways.
First, many state and local wage laws exempt union contracts from the
new, higher wage standard. These exemptions strictly serve union
self-interest by making non-union labor more expensive, thereby making
union labor more competitive.
For example, the heavily publicized SeaTac (a suburb of Seattle, Washington) $15 dollar per hour living wage, enacted on January 1, 2014, included a waiver that relieved unionized employers from the wage increase and sick leave mandate.
In 2014, the Los Angeles, California, City Council passed a living wage ordinance that
requires large hotels to pay employees $15.37 an hour. Tucked away in
the 10-page law is a section that declares, “All of the provisions of
this article, or any part of the article, may be waived in a bona fide
collective bargaining agreement.”
And union exemptions are not randomly included to such laws. Unions
use their massive political influence to secure these waivers and then
abuse the special privilege.
The Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel reported
as much regarding a recently passed living wage law in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin, that applied to Milwaukee County employees and contractors.
Aaron Rodriquez, journalist at the Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel,
interviewed Sally Sprenger, who runs a company that helps the elderly
and disabled, and contracts with the County. “Sprenger said SEIU
guaranteed her an exemption from paying the County’s wage hike if she
agreed to deduct union dues from all of her employees’ paychecks.”
Besides using the exemption to gain dues paying members, SEIU is
credited with writing the Milwaukee living wage ordinance. Sprenger
said, “SEIU told me they wrote the living wage ordinance and that they
singled out only the companies they represented.”
In addition, “Supervisor Jim ‘Luigi’ Schmitt told the Red Fox blog in
December that SEIU worked on 16 different drafts on the living wage
ordinance in collaboration with Supervisor David Bowen.”
Second, exemptions are not the only way that wage hikes are
advantageous to unions. Many collective bargaining agreements tie union
member wages to increases in the minimum wage.
For example, a SEIU Local 1877 contract reads,
“Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, employees shall
make at least 30 cents per hour over California or Federal minimum wage
rates.” Another SEIU contract requires “minimum hourly wage rates shall exceed any statutory applicable minimum wage rate by fifty cents.”
Clearly, SEIU and other unions support minimum and living wage increases, just not for the benevolent reasons they claim."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.