"Struggling to refute Mark Perry’s data showing that U.S. manufacturing output is growing, Sam Williford writes that “Nowhere does empirical evidence tell the story of a growing manufacturing sector” (Letters, March 5). Mr. Williford’s evidence? “Manufacturing as a percent of GDP has dropped from 21% in 1980 to 13% in 2008. The U.S. share of world manufacturing production has declined from 31% in 1980 to 24% in 2008. While it is still true that the U.S. is the world’s largest manufacturer, we are also by far the world’s largest importer.”
Let’s take these two arguments in turn.
First, just because manufacturing as a percent of GDP is falling does not mean that U.S. manufacturing output isn’t growing. If I get a raise during the same year that my teenage son first enters the workforce, my income falls as a percent of my household’s income, but my income is still properly described as “growing.” Ditto for U.S. manufacturing output as a percent of “world manufacturing production.”
Second, it’s hardly surprising that, being the world’s largest manufacturer, the U.S. is also the world’s largest importer. One should expect nothing else. Not only are at least one-third of U.S. imports used as inputs for U.S. manufactured goods, but also – being the world’s largest suppliers of both manufactured and service outputs – Americans are wealthy. And wealthy people can afford to spend lots money buying things from others."
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Don Boudreaux Again Refutes The Idea That Manufacturing Is Declining
Another one of his great letters, submitted to the WSJ. See Williford on Perry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.