skip to main |
skip to sidebar
No, America is not rigged against the workers
See
Economic Illiteracy from the New York Times by Dan Mitchell.
"Check out these excerpts from a New York Times column by Steven Greenhouse.
The United States is the only advanced industrial
nation that doesn’t have national laws guaranteeing paid maternity
leave. It is also the only advanced economy that doesn’t guarantee
workers any vacation, paid or unpaid, and the only highly developed
country (other than South Korea)
that doesn’t guarantee paid sick days. …Among the three dozen
industrial countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, the United States has the lowest minimum wage as a
percentage of the median wage — just 34 percent of the typical wage,
compared with 62 percent in France and 54 percent in Britain. It also
has the second-highest percentage of low-wage workers among that group…
All this means the United States suffers from what I call “anti-worker
exceptionalism.” …America’s workers have for decades been losing out:
year after year of wage stagnation.
Sounds like the United States is some sort of Dystopian nightmare for workers, right?
Well, if there’s oppression of labor in America, workers in other nations should hope and pray for something similar.
Here’s a chart showing per-capita “actual individual consumption”
for various nations that are part of the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development. As you can see, people in the United States
have much higher living standards.
[the OECD link has a table that shows that the OECD average is 100, like a price index, so that with the U.S. at 146, it means that we consume 46% more than average]
By the way, I can’t resist pointing out another big flow in Greenhouse’s NYT column.
He wrote that the U.S. has “the second-highest percentage of low-wage
workers.” That sounds like there’s lots of poverty in America.
Especially since the U.S. is being compared to a group of nations that
includes decrepit economies such as Mexico, Turkey, Italy, and Greece.
But this statement is nonsense because it is based on OECD numbers
that merely measure the percent of workers in each nation that earn
less than two-thirds of the national median level. Yet since median
income generally is much higher in the United States, it’s absurd to use
this data for international comparisons.
In other words, Greenhouse is relying on data that deliberately confuse
absolute living standards and relative living standards. Why?
Presumably to try to make the United States look bad and/or to advance a
pro-redistribution agenda."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.