See
Turbulence At Boeing by David Henderson. Excerpt:
"Some airlines have few 737 Max airplanes and won’t be much affected
by the prohibition on flying. Other airlines, such as Air Canada, have a
large number of such planes, not in absolute terms but as a percentage
of their fleet. According to its website,
Air Canada’s fleet has 172 airplanes that carry 150 passengers or more.
Of these, 24, or 14 percent, are 737 Max 8s. Air Canada is scrambling
to adjust. When I called last Friday to inquire about seat choice for a
trip this summer, the person who answered explained that my 42-minute
wait on the phone was due to that scramble.
Imagine, as seems reasonable, that Air Canada adjusts by replacing
some of the 737 Max 8s with smaller airplanes, such as its Embraer 190.
This would make sense if some 737 Max 8s had, say, 50 seats going empty.
Then it might need to drop frequency on shorter routes flown by the
Embraer. Other airlines, in the United States and elsewhere, might make
similar decisions.
The shorter the route dropped, the more likely it is that some people who would have otherwise flown would, instead, drive.
There’s the rub. Ample data show that for a given passenger, the
probability of dying in a car is two orders of magnitude higher than the
probability of dying on a commercial flight going the same distance.
Specifically, for U.S. commercial airlines between 2000 and 2010, a time
that includes 9/11, there were 0.2 deaths per 10 billion passenger miles.
For U.S. driving, by contrast, in 2000 there were 150 deaths per 10
billion passenger miles. That’s a ratio of 750 to 1. It’s true that
driving has gotten safer, but so has commercial airline travel. For any
given year, therefore, my two orders of magnitude comparison is
reliable.
That means that grounding the 737 Max 8, if it causes some flights to
be cancelled, could well cause more deaths on roads than the number of
airline passengers’ lives it saves. This conclusion follows directly if
everyone who gets bumped from a short flight drives instead and if the
737 Max 8 is not more dangerous than the other aircraft. But it follows
even if we weaken both of those assumptions. Let’s say that as few as 10
percent of people bumped from short-haul trips drive instead. And let’s
even grant that the 737 Max 8s are more dangerous, even 5 times as
dangerous.
Then do the math. Ten percent of people drive, thus choosing an
option that’s 750 times as risky per mile as flying. But even if the 737
Max 8 is 5 times as dangerous as the average commercial airplane, those
10 percent are choosing an option that is 150 times as dangerous as the
grounded 737 Max 8. Since 10 percent choose to drive, that’s 15 more
deaths in driving (10 percent of 150) per death saved by not flying.
That’s not a good deal for passengers."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.