Fifty-six percent of welfare recipients are in “
working families,”
according to a misleading recent report by the University of California
at Berkeley’s Center for Labor Research and Education. But the report
reached that erroneous conclusion by defining even very lazy people as
“workers”:
“We define working families as those that have at least one
family member who works 27 or more weeks per year and 10 or more hours
per week.” But working just ten hours a week for only about half the
weeks in the year doesn’t make you a typical worker, or show
industriousness. As Breitbart
notes,
“if someone is only working ten hours a week, there is probably time to
find a second job, rather than rely on government assistance.” The
Center that put out this ridiculous “study” is funded not just by
taxpayers, but also by government employee unions like
AFSCME whose members are hired to administer such welfare programs.
This slanted “study” coincides with a recent push by California’s
governor to expand welfare for so-called “workers” who actually do very
little work. The Associated Press
reported that Gov. Jerry Brown is
proposing a $380 million earned income tax
credit” for “as many as 825,000 families and up to 2 million
Californians. "It's just a straight deliverance of funding to people who
are working very hard and are earning very little money, so in that
sense I think it does a lot of good things," Brown said of the tax
credit. The average tax credit would be $460 a year with a maximum
credit of $2,653 for families with three or more children, to complement
the federal tax credit program. It would be available to individuals
with incomes of less than $6,580, or up to $13,870 for families with
three or more dependents.
For an individual to have an income of less than $6,580 at the
California minimum wage of $9 per hour, they would have to work no more
than 731 hours per year, or 14 hours per week. That’s not “working very
hard,” Governor Brown. The Associated Press story, which reads like a
press release for Governor Brown’s proposed budget, never even questions
his strange claim about this being hard work. The Associated Press
wrongly labeled the
record-setting
budget “a cautious approach to spending” even though it does nothing
about California’s massive unfunded pension problems, even as it relies
on tax increases that were supposedly temporary but will likely become
permanent, such as those in Proposition 30.
As the
Los Angeles Daily News noted,
“in 2013, California’s public-employee pension systems—including those
for police, firefighters and teachers—were carrying an estimated
aggregate of $198 billion in unfunded liability. That’s 31 times the
unfunded liability 10 years earlier.” Governor Brown has largely turned a
blind eye to pension-spiking by CALPERS that will explode California
pension costs by billions of dollars, half-heartedly objecting to
only one of the “ninety-nine categories used” in its “scheme.”"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.