See
On Bee Enslavement and Other Nonsense by
Angela Logomasini of CEI.
"I’ve seen many crazy headlines about the challenges facing honeybees, but this one takes the cake:
“Bee collapse is the result of their enslavement in industrial monocultures.”
So now, not only are humans “killing off”
bees, we are “enslaving” them! According to this article, “industrial
agriculture” is the problem and technological approaches won’t help
things. However, the authors don’t offer much of any solution other
than: “Until local agriculture replaces global agriculture, there will always be another parasite, another virus, another mysterious collapse.”
Although they don’t define “local agriculture,” their criticism on the use of pesticides and other methods for high-yield farming
suggests they would like to go organic. Unfortunately, that approach is
not only unlikely to help feed the world growing populations or create
affordable food domestically, it would also be bad news for wildlife.
As research scholar Indur Goklany and others have pointed out, producing more food per acre—thanks to agro-technologies such as pesticides and genetic modification—means we have more land for wildlife. For example, Goklany’s research shows that
if we did not have high-yield agriculture and we still farmed the way
we did back in 1910, we’d have to plant more than three times the amount
of land that we plant now to generate the same amount of food.
In that case, there would be less space left for wildlife. A better
approach involves the strategic use of technology along with private
stewardship to provide habitat for species. We can leverage the tools we
have and ensure minimal environmental impact along with taking
concerted actions to protect nature’s creatures at the same time.
But the authors of this article don’t offer any such balance and
instead provide misleading information by suggesting that farming
practices in remote areas of china prove that modern farming elsewhere
is bad for the environment. Superficially they say:
Despite impressions created in this article, hand pollination is not
widespread, is often done for economic rather than environmental
reasons, and bees there are not “extinct.” Entomologist Gwen Pearson,
Ph.D., offers a balanced article on this topic in this in Wired.
She explains that honeybees are not extinct in these areas of China
(some people keep them for honey production and some are used for
farming) and there are economic reasons that the people there chose to
hand pollinate.
It is true, as Pearson points out, the Chinese farmers appear to have
misused pesticides because they lack understanding about these modern
technologies. For example, some of the Chinese farmers don’t know that
spraying pesticides can kill valuable pollinators. If they did, they
could time spraying when bees are not foraging and be more strategic
about how they employ these tools. It’s also reasonable to assume that
they lack the wealth that allows farmers to set aside land for wildlife
as well as select the best and more appropriate technologies.
In fact, as Pearson notes, some amount of hand pollination in China is driven by economic forces
related to more efficient pollination and production of profitable
crops—even where active and healthy pollinators are available.
The simple reality remains: if people are to eat around the world,
agro-technologies along with the education on how to use them, is
critical. Of course, there are myriad other factors that impede
productive farming practices, including politics that promote poverty
rather than wealth creation.
Ultimately, it is market-driven wealth creation that facilitates
solutions, including private action for wildlife. Farmers and others
can, as many do, provide additional plantings of nectar-bearing flowers
to enhance the pollinators because it’s both in their best interest and
because they value wildlife.
Unfortunately, dumb government policies—such as government subsidies
and ethanol mandates in the U.S.—often deters conservation and strategic
use of land resources. And in government-dominated economies, such as
in China, regulations and resulting poverty and poor education are the
biggest impediments to rational approaches for farming and wildlife
conservation.
Technology is not the problem!"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.