By Daniel Ikenson of Cato.
"If
you count yourself among the majority of Americans fed up with the
unsavory, business-as-usual, backroom dealing that continues to define
Washington, take heart in the fact that the charter of the scandal-prone
U.S. Export-Import Bank is set to expire on June 30.
If you are among the misinformed or privileged few who support the
bank's reauthorization, how do you justify the collateral damage that
Ex-Im inflicts on companies in Pennsylvania and across the country?
Ex-Im is a government-run export credit agency that provides
below-market-rate financing and loan guarantees to facilitate sales
between U.S. companies and foreign customers. In 2013, roughly 75
percent of Ex-Im's subsidies were granted for the benefit of just 10
large companies - including Boeing, Bechtel, and General Electric - that
easily could have financed those transactions without taxpayer
assistance.
Supporters characterize the bank as a pillar of the economy,
undergirding U.S. export sales that allegedly create more and
higher-paying U.S. jobs. But a fatty sheath of willful ignorance has
insulated the bank from the scrutiny it deserves. Like all Washington
subsidy programs, Ex-Im gives to the few but takes from the many.
When the government subsidizes your competitor's sales but not yours,
you are made worse off because your competitor can now offer lower
prices or better sales terms than he could have otherwise. Call these
the "intra-industry" costs.
Likewise, when the government subsidizes your suppliers' sales to your
competitor, you are made worse off because your competitor's costs are
artificially reduced, enabling him to charge lower prices or offer
better sales terms than he could without the subsidy. Call these the
"downstream" costs.
Ex-Im's management and its Washington-savvy supporters have been running
a shell game, dazzling Congress with the shiny new export sales it
finances while drawing policymakers' attention away from the costs those
activities impose on everyone else.
Last year, Delta Airlines finally had enough and complained about Ex-Im
loans to Air India, which were granted to enable the foreign carrier to
purchase aircraft from Boeing. Delta officials demonstrated how those
taxpayer subsidies, made for the benefit of Boeing's bottom line, put
Delta at a competitive disadvantage by reducing Air India's capital
costs, enabling it to lower fares and compete more effectively with
Delta for international travelers. Why should taxpayer dollars be used
to promote the interests of one U.S. company over another?
The problem isn't limited to Delta. A recent Cato Institute study
estimated the net costs imposed on firms in downstream industries on
account of Ex-Im subsidies to firms in supplier industries to be $2.8
billion per year. The study also showed that firms in 80 percent of U.S.
manufacturing industries incur costs that exceed the total value of
Ex-Im subsidies they may receive. In other words, the average firm in
four of every five manufacturing industries is made worse off by the
Export-Import Bank.
Pennsylvania is home to hundreds of companies in the industries that
have been victimized in precisely the same manner as Delta. The
commonwealth's manufacturers of aerospace products, automobile parts,
computer network equipment, electrical products, machinery,
semiconductors, telecommunications equipment, and more can be counted
among the victims because their suppliers secured Ex-Im dollars to
subsidize sales to foreign customers.
Here are a few examples of Pennsylvania businesses that bear the costs
of Ex-Im's subsidies: Herley Industries, a search-and-navigation
equipment manufacturer in Lancaster with more than 1,000 employees;
Williamsport-based semiconductor manufacturer Primus Technologies, with
about 470 workers; telecommunications equipment producer Compunetix,
with 360 workers in Monroeville; and General Carbide Corp., a
metalworking machinery manufacturer with 160 employees in Greensburg.
There are many more.
According to the Cato study, the five broad manufacturing sectors
incurring the largest downstream costs from Ex-Im's subsidies account
for 40 percent of Pennsylvania's manufacturing economy. Included among
the 10 most heavily burdened sectors are the state's first, second,
fourth, and sixth most important manufacturing industries: chemicals;
food, beverage, and tobacco; primary metals; and computers and
electronics, respectively.
The Export-Import Bank temporarily benefits some companies in a
conspicuous manner. But it does so by quietly burdening often unwitting
American companies in downstream industries. Delta and others have cried
foul. Pennsylvania's business victims should speak up as well."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.