Will the sun put the brakes on global warming? by Michael Guillen, former Science Editor for ABC News,. He also taught physics at Harvard. He has a Ph.D. from Cornell University in physics, mathematics, and astronomy.
"The sun is like a teenager that cycles through mood
swings – from dramatic to chill and back again – roughly every eleven
years. But this time it’s different. It now appears the sun is heading
for a rare, super-chill period that threatens to add some unexpected
drama to today’s climate change discussion.
For most of its history, science
believed the sun’s output was constant. It was wrong. Today, we realize
that lots of things about the sun wax and wane every eleven years, most
notably its brightness and the number of explosive disturbances on its
surface called sunspots and faculae.
That’s not all. The eleven-year cycle itself snakes
up and down like a roller coaster, reaching “grand maxima” and “grand
minima” every 100-200 years. The last grand maximum peaked circa 1958,
after which the sun has been steadily quieting down. Today, the drop in activity is at its steepest in 9,300 years.
Is the sun headed for a grand minimum? If so, it immediately calls to mind the famous Maunder Minimum,
during which the sun languished for seventy years. From 1645 to 1715
the sun’s brightness dimmed by a fraction of one percent and the number
of sunspots and faculae plummeted to nearly zero.
On top of that, the Maunder Minimum occurred precisely during the coldest part of the centuries-long Little Ice Age,
when the average temperature of the northern hemisphere dropped by
about 1.1 degrees Fahrenheit. Was it a coincidence? Or did the Maunder
Minimum help drive the ice age? Here’s where the story about today’s
apparent plunge toward a solar grand minimum really heats up.
According to NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Earth’s temperature
has increased by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1880, roughly the
end of the Little Ice Age. The worst warming is yet to come, most
scientists claim, and not even a grand solar minimum will prevent it.
Using computer simulations, scientists at the
National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, estimate
that “a grand solar minimum in the middle of the 21st century
would slow down human-caused global warming and reduce the relative
increase of surface temperatures by several tenths of a degree [Celsius,
equal to about 0.5 degrees Fahrenheit].” But at the end of the grand
minimum, they say, the warming would simply pick up where it left off.
“Therefore … a grand solar minimum would slow down and somewhat delay, but not stop, human-caused global warming.”
But the sun’s dramatic quiescence comes with a
surprising complication: cosmic rays. They are subatomic particles –
mainly protons and helium nuclei – that originate from somewhere deep
within our galaxy. Their source is still a mystery.
Usually, the sun’s powerful magnetic field and
radioactive winds keep cosmic rays away from our neighborhood. But when
the sun weakens, the cosmic rays are freer to move in and bombard Earth.
New research shows
that upon striking the atmosphere, cosmic rays produce showers of
particles and ions that seed clouds with extraordinary efficiency. The
increased cloudiness shades Earth from the sun.
Recently, a team of Russian scientists compared the
cosmic-ray cooling mechanism to two other well-known drivers of climate
change – the sun’s inconstant brightness and greenhouse gases. Publishing in the "Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics,"
they maintain the cosmic-ray cooling phenomenon will dominate
everything else in the coming decades and actually force a period of
global cooling.
It is a radical hypothesis,
to be sure, but even mainstream scientists monitoring the sun’s rapidly
flagging behavior agree the growing likelihood of a grand minimum is
stirring up a grand maximum of uncertainty and excitement. “We are not
quite sure what the consequences of this will be,” says Yvonne Elsworth,
a solar physicist at England’s University of Birmingham, “but it’s
clear that we are in unusual times.”"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.