skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Angus Deaton Talks To Cato About His Book The Great Escape
Here is the link. Excerpts:
"Throughout history, the greatest episodes of human progress are what I
call “the great escapes.” The most obvious dimensions are the escapes
from material destitution, ill health, and premature mortality. I focus
mostly on health and wealth, but it’s worth mentioning that there are
many other examples as well.
Today, there are more people living under democracy, for example,
than ever before. There are enormous, large-scale reductions in violence
around the globe over the centuries which contribute greatly to human
well-being. We’ve seen huge increases in education, particularly — but
not exclusively — among women. In many parts of the world, the schools
they are going to leave a lot to be desired. But it’s a start, and it
reflects a trend that is quite new. Finally, I argue that increases in
life evaluations have also accompanied this progress. In short, people
know that their lives are better and they will tell you as much.
Now, just like in the movie, most of these episodes have only allowed
some to escape — leaving many others behind — but ultimately that’s the
nature of the beast. Progress does not come evenly. In that sense, it
is one of the great engines of inequality. But it’s very hard to object
to this sort of inequality. Why, if some escape and some don’t, is the
world a worse place? Well, it’s not."
"The absence of state capacity is one of the major contributors to
poverty and deprivation around the world. Without effective states
working with active and involved citizens, there is little chance for
the growth that is needed to abolish global poverty. Unfortunately, the
world’s rich countries are making things worse. Foreign aid undermines
the development of local state capacity.
This is most obvious in countries where the government receives large
amounts of direct aid. These governments need no contract with their
citizens, no parliament, and no tax-collection system. Why would they
pay any attention to the needs of their own people? If they are
accountable to anyone, it is to the donors. But even this fails in
practice.
Under pressure from their own citizens — who rightly want to help the
poor — wealthy countries feel the need to disburse money just as much
as poor-country governments need to receive it, if not more so. What
about bypassing governments and giving aid directly to the poor? The
immediate effects are likely to be better, especially in countries where
little government-to-government aid actually reaches the poor. And it
would take an astonishingly small sum of money — about 15 U.S. cents a
day from each adult in the rich world — to bring everyone up to at least
the destitution line of a dollar a day.
Yet this is no solution. The world’s poor cannot forever have their
health services run from abroad. What is missing from these countries is
not money. Poor people need government to lead better lives; taking
government out of the loop might improve things in the short run, but it
would leave unsolved the underlying problem. Aid is simply racked with
unintended consequences. It undermines what poor people need most: an
effective government that works with them for today and tomorrow.
In short, the world is a better place than it used to be, despite the
fact that many have yet to make the great escape. What can we to do to
help that process along? One thing that we can do is to agitate for our
own governments to stop doing those things that make it harder for poor
countries to stop being poor. Reducing aid is one, but so is limiting
the arms trade, improving rich-country trade and subsidy policies,
providing technical advice that is not tied to aid, and developing
better drugs for diseases that do not affect rich people.
Poor countries, just like their wealthy counterparts, need their own
good government — not one that was thought up for them by the rest of
the world. We cannot help the poor by making their already weak
governments even weaker."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.