skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Have changing household composition and retirement caused the decline in median household income?
From Mark Perry.
"
One
of the most frequently reported economic trends is the gradual decline
in US real median household income from its 1999 peak of about $57,000
to below $52,000 in each of the last three years (see blue line in top
chart above). We hear a number of reasons from politicians and pundits
for the decline in median household income over the last decade, mostly
reasons that involve a narrative about economic stagnation and growing
inequality caused by the progressives’ usual suspects: gains in worker
productivity, income and wealth going to corporations and “the rich”
instead of being shared by average workers; failure to increase the
minimum wage or pass “living wage” laws; the combined effects of
globalization, free trade and outsourcing putting downward pressure on
middle-class incomes in America, and other variations of economic
pessimism. Former President Bill Clinton recently offered his three reasons for stagnant median household income that include not raising the minimum wage and excessive corporate greed.
But
there are some other very obvious, but mostly overlooked, factors that
could easily explain why median household income has declined over the
last decade that have nothing to do with economic stagnation:
demographic changes in the composition of US households. AEI’s Alex
Pollock addressed this issue recently in his essay “If income is going
up, can median household income go down? It’s possible.” Here’s how Alex
frames the issue:
One of the most commonly cited
numbers in discussions of inequality is the trend in median household
income, often used as if it settled the issue. Using median household
income poses a fundamental problem, however. It conflates two
measurements — changes in the composition of households and changes in
income — and thus can easily mislead us.
Has the composition of
households in America been changing? Obviously, it has. The percent of
married couple households has fallen from more than 60 percent in 1980
to less than 50 percent in 2010. One-person households have risen from
23 percent to 27 percent of households in this period. Shifting from
two-earner households to one-earner households lowers the median
household income, even if everybody’s income is the same as before [or
rising].
Alex provides a series of hypothetical
examples showing how simple household demographic changes can result in
rising individual incomes while at the same time the median household
income is falling. For example, if there is a shift from two-earner,
married households to one-earner single households as a result of
divorce, the overall median household income could fall even when income
is increasing for all individuals in the new mix of households with a
greater share of single households.
Alex’s key point is that when
demographics and household composition are dynamically changing,
individual income and median household income can naturally move in
opposite directions. The most frequent mistake, according to Alex, is to
look at median household income over time assuming that household
demographics are static. And that is precisely the mistake made in
almost all of the discussions about median household income, and that
leads to a distorted and inaccurate conclusion about why median income
is falling.
One example of a major dynamic change in household composition is the significant increase in the share of US households with no earners, from fewer than 20% of all US households in 1980 to 23.7% of households in 2013 (see blue line in bottom chart above, Census data here from Table H-12). Likewise, the share of single-earner households has also increased from 33.2% in the early 1990s to above 37% for the last five years (see red line). In contrast, there’s been a decrease in the share of US households with 2 or more earners
from above 46% of all households in 1989 to fewer than 40% of US
households in every year since 2010 (see brown line in bottom chart
above).
In summary, over the last several decades, there’s been an
increasing share of no-earner, single-parent and single-earner
households and a decreasing share of married and two-or-more-earner
households. That major demographic shift has likely depressed median
household income significantly in the last decade, even though it’s
possible, as Pollock shows, that the income of individual working
Americans could be rising.
Another key demographic shift is the increasing number of retired Americans as a share of the adult population based on Social Security data.
As the red line in the top chart above shows, US retirees represented a
pretty stable 15% share of the US population from 1990 to 2008.
Starting around 2008 when the early “baby-boomers” – those born in 1946 —
reached early retirement age of 62, the share of retirees started
increasing from less than 15% of the adult population in 2007 to more
than 16.6% in 2013.
In the five year period between 2008 and 2013,
the number of retired Americans increased by 5.6 million, which was the
largest five-year increase in US history, and more than double the 2.5
million increase in the previous five-year period. Given that wave of
recent retirements, there have been millions of older, experienced,
highly-paid workers going from their peak earning levels to a much lower
retirement income that would typically include Social Security
payments, pensions, and distributions from retirement accounts. As those
millions of retirees are replaced in the workforce by younger, less
experienced, lower paid workers, median household income could be
falling even though the average income of working Americans could be
rising.
It’s probably no coincidence that the recent increase in
retirees, both in absolute numbers and as a share of the adult
population, along with the other demographic changes described above,
has naturally coincided with a decline in median household income. It
would be hard to imagine that an aging population with a significant
increase in the number and share of retirees, wouldn’t depress median
household income, for purely demographic reasons.
Bottom Line:
Most explanations of the recent decline in US median household income
are based on some variation of a narrative of economic stagnation,
rising inequality and pessimism. But what is almost always overlooked
are the very significant demographic changes that have taken place in
the composition of US households over time that would significantly
impact the income of the median US household. Taken together, a) the
increase in the share of no-earner, single-earner, and single-parent
households, b) the increase in the number and share of retirees, along
with c) the decline in the share of two-earner and married households,
would logically and necessarily depress the income level of the median
US household.
In summary, the composition of US households is not
static, fixed and permanent; rather it’s dynamic, evolving and
ever-changing. Discussions on changes in median household income over
time that ignore the changes in household composition over time will
always be incomplete, distorted and misleading. Perhaps the decline in
median household income this century is not a narrative of economic
pessimism and stagnation after all, but a more upbeat story of a greater
number of Americans living longer lives, and enjoying periods of time
in retirement that were never possible until this century."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.