skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Kevin Williamson on how progressives hold that the state, not the family or the market, is the central actor in our lives
Via Mark Perry
"The Reverend Jesse Jackson is right about something: “A
spark has exploded,” he said, referring to the protests and violence in
Ferguson, Mo. “When you look at what sparked riots in the Sixties, it
has always been some combination of poverty, which was the fuel, and
then some oppressive police tactic. It was the same in Newark, in
Chicago, in Detroit, in Los Angeles. It’s symptomatic of a national
crisis of urban abandonment and repression, seen in Chicago.
A question for the Reverend Jackson: Who has been running the show in
Newark, in Chicago, in Detroit, and in Los Angeles for a great long
while now? The answer is: People who see the world in much the same way
as does the Reverend Jackson, who take the same view of government, who
support the same policies, and who suffer from the same biases.
For years, our major cities were undermined by a confluence of four
unhappy factors: 1) higher taxes; 2) defective schools; 3) crime; and 4)
declining economic opportunity. Together, these weighed much more
heavily upon the middle class than upon the very wealthy and the very
poor.
Progressives spent a generation imposing taxes and other expenses on
urban populations as though the taxpaying middle class would not
relocate. They protected the defective cartel system of public
education, and the union money and votes associated with it, as though
middle-class parents would not move to places that had better schools.
They imposed burdens on businesses, in exchange for more union money and
votes, as though businesses would not shift production elsewhere. They
imposed policies that disincentivized stable family arrangements as
though doing so would have no social cost.
And they did so while adhering to a political philosophy that holds
that the state, not the family or the market, is the central actor in
our lives, that the interests of private parties — be they taxpayers or
businesses — can and indeed must be subordinated to the state’s
interests, as though individuals and families were nothing more than
gears in the great machine of politics. The philosophy of abusive
eminent domain, government monopolies, and opportunistic taxation is
also the philosophy of police brutality, the repression of free speech
and other constitutional rights, an economic despair. When life is
reduced to the terms in which it is lived in the poorest and most
neglected parts of Chicago or Detroit, the welfare state is the police
state.
The more progressive the city, the worse a place it is to be poor
and/or black. The most pronounced economic inequality in the United
States is not in some Republican redoubt in Texas but in San Francisco,
an extraordinarily expensive city in which half of all black households
make do with less than $25,000 a year. Blacks in San Francisco are
arrested on drug felonies at ten times their share of the general
population. At 6 percent of the population, they represent 40 percent of
those arrested for homicides. Whether you believe that that is the
result of a racially biased criminal-justice system or the result of
higher crime incidence related to socioeconomic conditions within black
communities (or some combination of those factors) what is undeniable is
that results for black Americans are far worse in our most progressive,
Democrat-dominated cities than they are elsewhere. The progressives
have had the run of things for a generation in these cities, and the
results are precisely what you see.
The Reverend Jesse Jackson should not be surprised that
places such as Ferguson, Mo., have feckless police departments. He
himself has spent his career helping to ensure that they have feckless
schools, self-serving bureaucracies, rapacious public-sector unions
pillaging the municipal fisc, and malevolent political leadership that
is by no means above exploiting racial sentiment in order to hold on to
power. His allies have been running U.S. cities for a generation, and it
takes a considerable measure of brass for him to come in decrying the
results as though he had no hand in them."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.