See
Yang vs. Warren: Who Has the Better Tax Plan? by Greg Mankiw. Excerpts:
"Senator Warren has proposed a new tax
on millionaires and billionaires. Every year, households would be taxed
2 percent on wealth exceeding $50 million or 3 percent on wealth
exceeding $1 billion. The revenue, Senator Warren has said, would fund programs such as universal child care and tuition for public higher education."
"less than 0.1 percent of families would pay this tax.
Determining
how much those families would owe, however, would be devilishly
difficult. One problem is that many kinds of wealth have no market
valuation.
Take Rihanna. She is
fabulously wealthy, but to put a number on her wealth, the I.R.S. would
have to also estimate the present value of her songs and their possible
future royalties. Sometimes, such intangible assets are sold on markets —
Michael Jackson
once bought the rights to Beatles songs — but often there is no market price for them.
How
popular will her songs be decades from now, and how much money will
they bring in? Any estimate would be an educated guess, at best, yet it
would have to be made.
A similar situation arises for many
family businesses. When businesses are sold, accountants often attribute
significant value to an intangible asset called good will. To assess a
wealth tax, the I.R.S. would have to estimate the good will of every
family business that hasn’t been sold.
Good
will is hard to measure: It includes things like a business’s brand
name, reputation, technology and its network of customers and contacts.
Simple formulas that the I.R.S. might use to calculate this could result
in substantial inequities and perhaps litigation.
More
important, Senator Warren’s tax would likely raise less revenue than
its proponents believe, as rich people would take actions to avoid it.
For
example, the Warren tax may provide an incentive for high-wealth
couples to divorce. Whereas a married couple could exempt $50 million of
wealth from the tax, two unmarried partners could each exempt $50
million for a total of $100 million. Given the 2 percent tax rate,
married couples could avoid $1 million per year in taxes by divorcing.
Giving
money to adult children would also reduce a family’s tax liability. A
married couple with three adult children could, by divorcing and
gift-giving, exempt $250 million from the Warren tax.
In
addition, rich folk planning to bequeath much of their wealth to
charity would have an incentive to accelerate that giving during their
lives, shrinking the wealth base subject to the Warren tax."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.