By architect Kurt Kohlstedt of 99percentinvisible. It has some great pictures. Excerpts.
"Pictures of Paris tend to show off key architectural features of the
city, like the Eiffel Tower, the Arc de Triomphe, the Notre-Dame
Cathedral or, in the case of more everyday buildings: mansard roofs.
Punctured by dormer windows, these steeply sloped roofs are an iconic
part of the local vernacular. And their ubiquity is not just driven by
aesthetics, but also a history of height limitations in the City of
Light.
In 1783, Paris implemented a 20-meter (roughly 65 feet) restriction
on structures, with a crucial caveat: the limit was based on measuring
up to the cornice line, leaving out the roof zone above.
Naturally, land owners seeking to optimize their habitable space
responded by building up mansard roofs. Later window-based taxes offset
some of the financial incentive behind this design strategy, but in
1902, an expansion of the law allowed up to four additional floors to be
built using the roof-related loophole, helping to re-expand its
utility. Similar restrictions in other places helped the mansard style
spread beyond Paris as well.
A 1916 zoning resolution in New York City, for instance, called for
setbacks on tall buildings. Mansard roofs represented an ideal design
choice, practical but also associated with Parisian culture.
Dutch canal houses are another classic example of how rules and
regulations can shape structures. Taxed on their canal frontage rather
than height or depth, these buildings grew in tall and thin. In turn,
this typology evolved narrower staircases, necessitating exterior hoist
systems to move furniture and goods into and out of upper floors.
Meanwhile, across Europe — including England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland
and France — a history of “window taxes” also reshaped the built
environment, albeit in less aesthetically pleasing ways. Mainly, these
levies resulted in owners bricking up windows to avoid the tax.
Window taxes date back as far as 1696, introduced by English King
William III as an alternative to income taxes for the wealthy. Houses in
England were taxed by unit at a flat rate, then an additional rate if
they had over 10 windows (then more again if they went over 20 or 30).
And though they were repealed in most places well over a century ago,
the legacy of bricked-up windows remains on many old structures.
These kinds of external factors can shape the interiors of
structures, too. As far back as the 9th century (and possibly earlier), “hearth taxes” were
used by the Byzantine Empire as a proxy for family units, levied based
on the number of fireplaces in a municipality. However, later versions
of this tax were known to cause some unintended consequences. For
instance, a baker in the 1600s broke through his back wall to use the
neighbor’s chimney and avoid a hearth tax. A resulting fire destroyed 20
homes and killed four people."
"The list of true examples is long, with even small-seeming taxes
shaping the fundamental building blocks of structures as well as
materials used in everyday decor. Great Britain is rich with such
tax-impacted design history.
In 1712, a tax was introduced on patterned, printed and painted
wallpaper, for instance, leading people to buy plain paper and stencil
designs on it (thus avoiding the tax).
A few decades later the imposition of a weight-based glass tax led to
the production of smaller as well as more hollow-stemmed glassware
(often referred to as “excise glasses”).
Introduced in 1784, a per-thousand-brick tax led to the creation of
larger bricks (eventually held in check by new legislation about how big
a single brick could be). To this day, historians can use brick size to
help date the construction of different buildings around Britain."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.