Update On Compensation Of Private Workers Vs. Government Workers

See How to Save $1 Trillion by Andrew Biggs of AEI.

"Jason Richwine of the Heritage Foundation and I have published a new revision of our working paper “Comparing Federal and Private Sector Compensation” that includes improved estimates of compensation differences between federal and private-sector employees through salaries, benefits, and job security. We made significant improvements in all three areas, using better data and methods to produce more precise estimates.

The basic approach was to compare compensation for federal employees to private-sector employees with the same earnings-related attributes, principally education and experience but also controlling for gender, race, immigration and marital status, region, and broad occupational categories. This approach tries to calculate what a federal employee would earn were he or she to work in the private sector, thereby isolating the federal pay penalty or premium.

We begin with salaries, where we find that federal employees receive salaries around 14 percent higher on average than similar private-sector workers. Less educated federal workers received the largest pay premium and the premium rises as job tenure increases. We supplemented our basic salary calculations with a “fixed effects” approach, which follows single individuals as they shift in or out of federal jobs. This method shows that the same person will tend to earn a higher salary in federal employment than in the private sector. And it debunks the often-heard claim that federal employees could earn more on the outside—in fact, most people who leave federal employment experience a salary cut, while most who enter federal employment receive a pay increase.

But the premium in salaries pales next to that paid through benefits. Federal workers receive 76 percent more paid time off than similar private-sector workers and twice as much supplemental pay, which includes overtime and holiday pay and bonuses. But the biggest difference is in terms of retirement benefits: improved methodology for calculating the value of defined-benefit pensions, data on a hidden $2 billion annual subsidy to the defined contribution Thrift Savings Plan, and calculations of the value of federal retiree health benefits show that overall compensation through retirement benefits is 5.6 times higher for federal workers than in the private sector. Once all benefits are included, the federal compensation premium rises to around 35 percent.

On top of this, federal workers have far better job security than private-sector employees. Once a federal employee has passed his probationary period, his annual probability of being terminated for cause is only around 0.27 percent, while the chance of being laid off is only around 0.02 percent. This job security has value. We found, for instance, that congressional staff—who don’t have the job protections of other federal employees—are given significantly higher pension benefits in explicit compensation for lower job security. And federal employee job security becomes even more valuable when it is protecting a position that pays higher salaries and benefits than an employee would receive in the private sector. Adding the value of job security, the total federal compensation premium rises to 61 percent. In other words, most federal employees would accept significant reductions in pay before they would quit and look for a private-sector position.

Overall, the federal pay premium in 2011 comes to around $77 billion. Over ten years, paying federal employees at market rates could save the budget almost $1 trillion. Overcompensation of the federal workforce isn’t the biggest problem facing the federal budget, but when you’re as deep in the hole as we are, we need to look for savings everywhere."