Scientific and media bias promote the illusion that global warming produces nothing but bad results
By Bjorn Lomborg. Excerpts:
"The 2025 Atlantic hurricane season ended on Sunday, and not a single hurricane made landfall in the continental U.S. this year."
"But notice what’s missing from the coverage. A New York Times article in October highlighted hurricanes “turning away from the East Coast,” noting 12 named storms so far but only one minor tropical storm brushing the U.S. This was framed as welcome relief, with the misses attributed to atmospheric steering patterns like the Bermuda high-pressure system.
Not once did the piece invoke climate change. The journalists seem to believe that climate change can cause only bad outcomes. If warmer oceans energize storms, couldn’t they also influence other meteorological phenomena that diverted this year’s hurricanes harmlessly out to sea? No one ran the models to check. No professors lined up for quotes."
"you’ll find climate framing in hurricane coverage dating back to the mid-2000s—tying intense storms and active seasons again and again to global warming. These stories overflow with experts declaring each event a harbinger of climate doom, backed by fresh attribution studies. Yet when reality bucks this narrative, no one makes the connection."
"There are essentially no studies that will attribute to global warming a cold wave made milder or never forming—which could save thousands of lives. Yet there are plenty of studies that will tell you that one specific heat wave or another was made worse by global warming."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.