"First, it attributes more weight to that which is seen than to that which is unseen. It's easy to talk a lot about the jobs mechanization will destroy. It’s easy because we see the jobs disappearing. But it’s very difficult to talk about the jobs that will appear. That requires imagining new products, industries, and circumstances that don’t yet exist.
At the dawn of the automobile, people could clearly see unemployed farriers, blacksmiths, and teamsters, but they could not imagine Toyota, Goodyear, Jiffy Lube, McDonald's, or Uber. Today’s prognosticators are no different. They claim that “this time” it’s different. But so too did people at the invention of the nuclear power, the telephone, the telegraph, the steam engine, the printing press, the compass, and countless other inventions.
The second fatal error is the confusion of work and consumption. Some people enjoy and derive fulfillment from their jobs. To that extent, jobs are good. But to some degree – and in some cases, it’s a large degree – the only reason people do their jobs is that they are paid. To that extent, jobs are a bad thing. Personal fulfillment aside, jobs are a means to an end – and that end is consumption. If we could continue to consume but not work, many would be happy to do so.
The video offers evidence of the decline in economic prospects that, over the past decades, production has risen 42% yet we have the same 194 billion hours’ worth of jobs. The video has it backward – that's actually a good thing. It means that we have 42% more cars, phones, houses, shoes, movies, and myriad other things we desire, all in exchange for the same 194 billion hours of work.
That’s not just a good thing. It’s a marvelous thing. And it was made possible by mechanization."
Wednesday, June 14, 2017
Video bemoaning the rise of automation and machinery suffers from two fatal errors
See Automation Is Not "Different This Time," and That's a Good Thing by Antony Davies. He is an associate professor of economics at Duquesne University in Pittsburg.